Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Shaping Science with RhetoricThe Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Leah Ceccarelli

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780226099064

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 September 2021

A Text Rhetorically Designed to Fuel Interdisciplinary Hostilities

A Text Rhetorically Designed to Fuel Interdisciplinary Hostilities

Chapter:
(p.128) 7 A Text Rhetorically Designed to Fuel Interdisciplinary Hostilities
Source:
Shaping Science with Rhetoric
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.003.0007

A rhetorical analysis of Wilson's Consilience can offer a new way of understanding why his appeal for interdisciplinarity has not been as successful as he hoped it would be. It suggests that both opponents and supporters are right to a certain degree. This chapter argues that several rhetorical choices made by Wilson negatively influenced the outcome of his appeal for interdisciplinarity. First, Wilson's failure to inspire those who were not already in his camp was largely due to the fact that he employed rhetoric of conquest. Second, Wilson lost many of his readers because of the particular theory he chose to promote in his interdisciplinary appeal. Third, Wilson employed a form of polysemy that did more to damage his own ethos than to smooth tensions between disciplines. Even the biggest supporters of Wilson recognized his rhetorical error in treating the social sciences and the humanities as territories to be conquered, or entities to be cannibalized, by the intellectually superior culture of science.

Keywords:   rhetorical analysis, Wilson's Consilience, polysemy, Interdisciplinarity

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.