Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Y. Campbell and Martin Feldstein

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780226092553

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226092560.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 17 September 2021

The Transition to Investment-Based Social Security When Portfolio Returns and Capital Profitability Are Uncertain

The Transition to Investment-Based Social Security When Portfolio Returns and Capital Profitability Are Uncertain

Chapter:
(p.41) 2 The Transition to Investment-Based Social Security When Portfolio Returns and Capital Profitability Are Uncertain
Source:
Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform
Author(s):

Martin Feldstein

Elena Ranguelova

Andrew Samwick

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226092560.003.0003

This chapter explores the transition from a pay-as-you-go system of social security pensions to an investment-based system in an economy in which portfolio returns and capital profitability are both uncertain. It analyzes the effects of investment risk on a proposal for prefunding social security put forward in earlier work by Martin Feldstein and Andrew Samwick. Feldstein and Samwick examine the effect of adding modest contributions to personal retirement accounts (PRAs) — initially set at 3 percent of earnings. Over a seventy-five-year transition period, as PRA savings accumulate, payroll taxes could decline to zero, and the PRA contribution rate could rise slightly to a steady-state 4.25 percent level. The chapter also assumes that the PRA portfolio is invested 60 percent in equities and 40 percent in corporate bonds, and suggests that investment risk in this portfolio can be handled by a combination of a higher PRA contribution rate, to shift the distribution of retirement benefits upward, and a government guarantee that total benefits under the new system will be at least as large as those under the current system.

Keywords:   pay-as-you-go system, social security, pensions, portfolio returns, capital profitability, investment risk, prefunding, personal retirement accounts, payroll taxes, corporate bonds

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.