Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Deconstructing DignityA Critique of the Right-to-Die Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Scott Cutler Shershow

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780226088129

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226088266.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 15 October 2019

The Right to Die: Mapping a Contemporary Debate

The Right to Die: Mapping a Contemporary Debate

Chapter:
(p.85) Chapter Five The Right to Die: Mapping a Contemporary Debate
Source:
Deconstructing Dignity
Author(s):

Scott Cutler Shershow

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226088266.003.0005

This chapter argues that the arguments on both sides of the debate about a right to die are characterized by unacknowledged contradictions, and in particular by a tension between the claims of calculation and incalculability. Those in favor of a right to die argue above all that such a right is the supreme expression of individual autonomy, freedom, and reasoned choice. They also, however, implicitly undermine this argument by also suggesting that the establishment of such a right would also conserve scarce medical resources. Those opposed to a right to die, similarly, argue above all for an unconditional principle of “always care, never kill.” But they also implicitly qualify this absolute principle by eschewing all possibility of reasoned choice, and arguing that even though some cases seem to justify a right to die, to allow even these will put on us on a “slippery slope” towards a “culture of death.” This side also undermines the principle of unconditional care even more fatally by yoking it to an ethics of the marketplace by which, in practice, such care would be distributed according to the vagaries of birth, employment and fortune.

Keywords:   Right to die, Euthanasia, Autonomy, Freedom of Choice, Assisted-Suicide, Death with Dignity, Leon R. Kass, Wesley J. Smith, Brian Clark, Whose Life Is it Anyway?, Paul Ramsey

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.