Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Politics of ScaleA History of Rangeland Science$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nathan F. Sayre

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226083117

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226083391.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 24 September 2021

Fire and Climax

Fire and Climax

Bureaucratic Divisions of Scientific Labor

Chapter:
(p.61) Two Fire and Climax
Source:
The Politics of Scale
Author(s):

Nathan F. Sayre

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226083391.003.0003

Chapter 2 explains the origins of another blind spot, fire, and its relation to Frederic Clements’ theory of succession. Clements conceived of vegetation as in equilibrium with climate and soils; following disturbance, the processes that produced a given vegetation community over long time scales (primary succession) would drive a return to “climax” equilibrium conditions (secondary succession). Clements viewed fire as an external disturbance that interfered with succession, and the Forest Service considered all fires to be unequivocally bad. There was strong pressure to graze the national forests heavily to suppress fires, but a policy of “overgrazing” was impolitic. Arthur Sampson, a former student of Clements, proposed that overgrazing could be detected early by studying plant composition for signs of departure from climax conditions: grazing was counter-successional, and stocking rates therefore could be set to balance successional forces and maintain the vegetation in a desired state. Jardine misinterpreted Sampson’s argument to mean that correct stocking rates could be static, avoiding the difficulty of adjusting herds to fluctuating rainfall and forage production. Circumstantial evidence suggests that successional theory and static stocking were adopted to ensure that there would be little or no grass to fuel fires during drought years.

Keywords:   Arthur Sampson, climax, fire, forestry, grazing, overgrazing, retrogression, rotation grazing, plant succession

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.