Aristotle and the Beginnings of Allegorical Exegesis
Aristotle and the Beginnings of Allegorical Exegesis
This chapter focuses on the restrained analysis of tragedy and adoption of a conciliatory attitude toward allegory by Aristotle, who gave an explanation about the close relation established between myth and philosophy. Myth is an alarming instrument of consensus because it draws on the particularly powerful and universal feelings of fear and pity as all human beings without exception are sensitive to fear and pity. Aristotle was interested in allegory and even practiced it by paralleling his interest in tragedy. He did not adopt an attitude of radical rupture with myth compared to the the attitude of Plato. Aristotle wanted to take popular traditions into account by dissociating the instruction they carried from the narrative in which this instruction was expressed, and this attitude led him to justify allegory and to practice it.
Keywords: tragedy, attitude, allegory, Aristotle, Plato, myth, practice, fear, pity
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.