- Title Pages
-
Introduction Why the Demarcation Problem Matters -
1 The Demarcation Problem -
2 Science and Pseudoscience -
3 Toward a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience -
4 Defining Pseudoscience and Science -
5 Loki's Wager and Laudan's Error -
6 The Problem of Demarcation -
7 Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-Called -
8 Paranormalism and Pseudoscience as Deviance -
9 Belief Buddies versus Critical Communities -
10 Science and the Messy, Uncontrollable World of Nature -
11 Science and Pseudoscience -
12 Evolution -
13 Is a Science of the Supernatural Possible? -
14 Navigating the Landscape between Science and Religious Pseudoscience -
15 Argumentation and Pseudoscience -
16 Why Alternative Medicine Can Be Scientifically Evaluated -
17 Pseudoscience -
18 The Holocaust Denier's Playbook and the Tobacco Smokescreen -
19 Evolved to Be Irrational? -
20 Werewolves in Scientists' Clothing -
21 The Salem Region -
22 Pseudoscience and Idiosyncratic Theories of Rational Belief -
23 Agentive Thinking and Illusions of Understanding - Contributors
- Index
The Salem Region
The Salem Region
Two Mindsets about Science
- Chapter:
- (p.397) 21 The Salem Region
- Source:
- Philosophy of Pseudoscience
- Author(s):
John S. Wilkins
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
This chapter distinguishes between two mindsets about science—the deductivist mindset and inductivist mindset—and explores the cognitive styles relating to authority and tradition in both science and pseudoscience. The deductivist tends to see problems as questions to be resolved by deduction from known theory or principle. The inductivist sees problems as questions to be resolved by discovery. Those leaning towards a deductivist mindset may find results that conflict with prior theoretical commitments unacceptable. The deductivist tends to be a cognitive conservative, and the inductivist a cognitive progressive. The conservative mindset more often leads to resentment about modernism and hence about certain scientific results.
Keywords: science, pseudoscience, deductivist mindset, inductivist mindset, cognitive styles
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
- Title Pages
-
Introduction Why the Demarcation Problem Matters -
1 The Demarcation Problem -
2 Science and Pseudoscience -
3 Toward a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience -
4 Defining Pseudoscience and Science -
5 Loki's Wager and Laudan's Error -
6 The Problem of Demarcation -
7 Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-Called -
8 Paranormalism and Pseudoscience as Deviance -
9 Belief Buddies versus Critical Communities -
10 Science and the Messy, Uncontrollable World of Nature -
11 Science and Pseudoscience -
12 Evolution -
13 Is a Science of the Supernatural Possible? -
14 Navigating the Landscape between Science and Religious Pseudoscience -
15 Argumentation and Pseudoscience -
16 Why Alternative Medicine Can Be Scientifically Evaluated -
17 Pseudoscience -
18 The Holocaust Denier's Playbook and the Tobacco Smokescreen -
19 Evolved to Be Irrational? -
20 Werewolves in Scientists' Clothing -
21 The Salem Region -
22 Pseudoscience and Idiosyncratic Theories of Rational Belief -
23 Agentive Thinking and Illusions of Understanding - Contributors
- Index
