Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Optional LawThe Structure of Legal Entitlements$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ian Ayres

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780226033464

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 25 June 2022

Relaxing Other (Administrative, Informational, and Cognitive) Assumptions

Relaxing Other (Administrative, Informational, and Cognitive) Assumptions

Chapter:
(p.133) Chapter Eight Relaxing Other (Administrative, Informational, and Cognitive) Assumptions
Source:
Optional Law
Author(s):

Ian Ayres

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.003.0008

Real-world non-consensual takings may impose costs—real social costs—not just of administration (in courts calculating the damages and private parties litigating a dispute), but also in terms of what would broadly be considered switching costs. Each non-consensual transfer of ownership might in some contexts impose costs on one party or the other. Property rules tend to deter non-consensual takings and thus avoid the costs of administering a liability-rule regime. This chapter examines whether alternative administrative, informational, or cognitive assumptions qualify the ultimate implication that liability rules can often be used as a way for the law to delegate allocational authority so as to harness the information of private litigants. It considers three assumptions: the litigants are imperfectly informed about their own valuations, the litigants' probability functions are not common knowledge, and courts systematically misestimate the probability distributions of the litigants' value. It also discusses cognitive bias and wealth effects, along with unintentional takings.

Keywords:   non-consensual takings, transfer of ownership, liability rules, cognitive bias, wealth effects, unintentional takings, litigants, allocational authority, probability distributions, valuations

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.