Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Social Lives of ForestsPast, Present, and Future of Woodland Resurgence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Susanna B. Hecht, Kathleen D. Morrison, and Christine Padoch

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226322667

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226024134.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 17 October 2021

* The Invisible Map

* The Invisible Map

Community Tenure Rights

Chapter:
(p.291) 22 * The Invisible Map
Source:
The Social Lives of Forests
Author(s):

Deborah Deborah Barry

, Ruth Meinzen-Dick
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226024134.003.0026

In recent history, forests have been seen as the purview of the the state and private managers, regardless of historical uses and users. Local communities were often invisible to state institutions, which allocated concessions in ways that triggered significant conflict. More recently, more than 250 million ha of forests have been turned back to their communities on the basis of historical claims of access. The inscription of new and traditional forms of rights has altered access, use, and decision-making rights in profound ways. Local participation in reforms is a fundamental, but often-overlooked step. The legal devolution of forest rights to ancestral or new forest dwellers has spurred the emergence and growth of participatory community land-use mapping (PLUM), used by human rights activists, development practitioners, ethnographers, geographers, and conservationists, expanding opportunities for local community participation. This chapter explores a practical tool for mapping tenure rights to help communities clarify internal systems of rights, rules-in-use and responsibilities, or to note where these do not exist. Such tools can give the systems visibility and credibility for negotiating with the state, any regulatory or normative framework, development project, or private investment being considered.

Keywords:   Forest institutions, forest land reform, tenurial regimes, participatory politics, mapping, visibility and historic rights

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.