This book concludes by presenting two arguably uncontentious conclusions that may be drawn concerning the early modern political theorists and writers selected for this study. First, an individual author's stance on the legitimacy of political resistance has no predictable correlation with the position he adopts on the legitimacy of institutional slavery. Second, for writers concerned with systematization, attitudes toward contemporaneous, transatlantic slavery are thoroughly imbricated with theorization of specific political rights. In the Euro-colonialist arena, antityrannicism's plasticity appears in relations among colonizers, the colonized, and the home government—relations that can be configured variously. Although within European nation-states, antityranny discourse is similarly mobile yet productive in very different ways, antityrannicism's numerous discursive progeny need not eclipse a historical development, glimpses of which have appeared throughout this study.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.