Page of

2002: Common Ground after Two Centuries

2002: Common Ground after Two Centuries

Chapter:
(p.204) XXII. 2002: Common Ground after Two Centuries
Source:
A Community Built on Words
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.003.0023

A few ago, the distinguished philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre argued that American constitutional law is empty at its center. In any contentious constitutional case, he wrote, the Supreme Court “play[s] the role of a peace-making or truce-keeping body by negotiating its way through an impasse of conflict, not by invoking our society's shared moral first principles. For our society as a whole has none.” MacIntyre's assertion begs the question of what relationship can or ought to exist between moral first principles and the principles embodied in a constitution of government; but even with respect to constitutional law itself, MacIntyre's accusation is in error. The United States does have a set of shared constitutional first principles. This chapter attempts to identify them, even if admittedly at a very high level of generality and with no thought of exclusivity.

Keywords:   constitutional law, constitutional case, Supreme Court, moral first principles, Alasdair MacIntyre, constitutional first principles

Sign In

Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy and Legal Notice