Page of

Medical Interests and Priorities

Medical Interests and Priorities

Chapter:
(p.66) Three Medical Interests and Priorities
Source:
Doctors and Demonstrators
Author(s):
Drew Halfmann
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226313443.003.0003

This chapter explains the differing engagement of the medical associations with abortion politics by focusing on the ways in which they constructed their “interests” and priorities in the context of national medical-care systems. The chapter speaks of how the British and Canadian reforms delegated responsibility for abortion to the medical profession, removing the issue from public decision making and confining it to a realm in which decisions were made “neutrally” on the basis of “knowledge.” By contrast, the American reform made abortion a public issue decided on the basis of “values.” Finally, the minimal involvement of American mainstream medicine in abortion provision reduced the availability of abortions by concentrating provision in single-purpose clinics in large cities and being served by doctors that were often stigmatized by their mainstream peers. British abortion services were better distributed and better integrated into mainstream medicine, though Canadian ones were not.

Keywords:   medical associations, abortion politics, medical-care systems, medical profession, mainstream medicine, single-purpose clinics

Sign In

Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy and Legal Notice