Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Talking about PoliticsInformal Groups and Social Identity in American Life$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Katherine Cramer Walsh

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780226872186

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226872216.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 November 2017

The Data Are Not Given: Perspectives, Political Trust, and the 2000 Elections

The Data Are Not Given: Perspectives, Political Trust, and the 2000 Elections

Chapter:
(p.147) Chapter 7 The Data Are Not Given: Perspectives, Political Trust, and the 2000 Elections
Source:
Talking about Politics
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226872216.003.0010

This chapter illustrates the way in which small groups of people interpret politics with socially rooted perspectives through an analysis of interpretations of a major political event, the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election. It analyzes conversations about the outcome among the “Old Timers” in the study and among a group of African Americans who sit on the other side of the store. In particular, It focuses on the implications of their different interpretations for their perceptions of trust in government. The investigation reveals that the information people use to update their attitudes toward government is not a given but is, instead, perceived through identity-based perspectives. These analyses show how the perspectives people use to communicate coincide with very different interpretations of the same event. In addition, the chapter demonstrates that explaining political interpretations on the basis of partisanship is insufficient for understanding how two people can view the very same event in starkly divergent ways. It concludes that the theories of the dynamics of attitudes such as political trust can be enhanced by attention to socially rooted perspectives.

Keywords:   political interpretation, 2000 presidential election, Old Timers, African Americans, political trust, social roots

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.