Aristotle came to the conclusions he did in the absence (or in defiance) of the observation that females have smaller brains, different skulls, paler skin, softer bones, and fewer teeth than males. He observed differences between the bones possessed by different kinds of animal, but nowhere does he indicate that these observations themselves led him to conclude that males have harder bones than females. Aristotle would have been aware of why wisdom teeth were present in a thirty-seven-year-old man but absent in an eighteen-year-old woman, so it is unlikely he would have used a comparison of men and women of these ages to support his view that males have more teeth than females. His expectation that females would be physically inferior to males in areas not yet researched possibly caused him to investigate these matters insufficiently.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.