Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
ParaliteraryThe Making of Bad Readers in Postwar America$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Merve Emre

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226473833

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226474021.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 November 2018

Retracing One’s Steps

Retracing One’s Steps

Chapter:
(p.253) Conclusion Retracing One’s Steps
Source:
Paraliterary
Author(s):

Merve Emre

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226474021.003.0008

The conclusion reflects on the ethics and politics of literary reception at mid-century, and how it might speak to scholars confronting literature's diminished role in today’s public sphere. Recently, a range of exciting interdisciplinary approaches to reading—surface, distant, New Ethics—have sought alternatives to symptomatic reading and its “hermeneutics of suspicion.” But critics want more than to read differently: they want reading to transform individuals into different kinds of ethical subjects who are “susceptible, just, and physically intimate” (Emily Apter and Elaine Freedgood). The the better place to locate such ethical subjects is not among critics, or in the institutions of professional literary education, but in the state, civic, and economic institutions that bad readers have flitted into and out of during their lives. Institutions (e.g., women’s colleges, American Express, National Geographic) all house what Lahire calls an “embodied archive”: a record of how individuals form constitutive relationships between reading literature and objective structures of actions. Here we can begin to recover the contemporary value of the postwar connection between literature, action, and interaction. Academic critics cannot simply imagine their way into non-critical reading, not if it involves shedding the habits and dispositions they have cultivated over decades of work.

Keywords:   teaching, sociology, institutions

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.