Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Revolution of the OrdinaryLiterary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Toril Moi

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226464305

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226464589.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 May 2018

Signs, Marks, and Archie Bunker

Signs, Marks, and Archie Bunker

Post-Saussurean Visions of Language

Chapter:
(p.129) 6 Signs, Marks, and Archie Bunker
Source:
Revolution of the Ordinary
Author(s):

Toril Moi

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226464589.003.0007

This chapter shows how the “philosophizing” of Saussure’s legacy reproduces the Augustinian picture of meaning, and gives rise to empty, and formalist, theories of meaning and literature. While Knapp and Michaels detest the post-Saussurean arguments of thinkers like Derrida and de Man, they too adopt the post-Saussurean notion of the “mark,” or the empty signifier. Knapp and Michaels, however, don’t stop there, but insist that the author’s intentions always endow the mark with meaning. Words without an author, however, are mere material marks, meaningless squiggles. Their view is echoed by Fish. The chapter criticizes de Man’s reading of Austin, his idea that grammar and rhetoric are binary opposites, and his unconvincing analysis of an episode of All in the Family. Drawing on Cavell, and on Ted Cohen’s work on jokes, it shows how de Man’s commitment to a general theory of language, and literature, makes him incapable of noticing use. Thus he fails to understand how the specific situation, the specific plight, of specific speakers affect the meaning of their words.

Keywords:   Augustinian picture of language, author's intentions, Walter Benn Michaels, Steven Knapp, Stanley Fish, Paul de Man, Ted Cohen, Stanley Cavell, J. L. Austin, the mark

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.