Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
WildnessRelations of People and Place$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gavin Van Horn and John Hausdoerffer

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226444666

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226444970.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 November 2017

Losing Wildness for the Sake of Wilderness

Losing Wildness for the Sake of Wilderness

The Removal of Drakes Bay Oyster Company

Chapter:
(p.100) 11 Losing Wildness for the Sake of Wilderness
Source:
Wildness
Author(s):

Laura Alice Watt

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226444970.003.0012

In 2014, Drakes Bay Oyster Company, a historic oyster farm operating sustainably within the Point Reyes National Seashore, was forced to end operations by the National Park Service, which considered it incompatible with wilderness designation at the Seashore. This decision ran counter to the original intention behind the 1976 legislation that not only established 25,000 acres of wilderness at Point Reyes but also placed 8,000 acres of tidelands in a novel category of “potential” wilderness. Wilderness law history shows its origins in a pragmatic approach, accommodating rural land uses while limiting federal agencies’ tendencies toward road-building and overdevelopment. In 1976, legislators and environmentalists alike considered the oyster operation to be compatible with wilderness designation; only the State of California retained rights in the tidelands, which necessitated creation of the “potential” category as a compromise measure. Since then, however, shifting conceptions of wilderness have become more purist, and environmental advocates fought hard to remove the oyster farm, insisting its continued operation would set a harmful precedent for wilderness nationwide. This absolutist interpretation of wilderness fundamentally misconstrues the meaning of the “potential” category, and allows little room for working landscapes, in which humans play beneficial roles while keeping the land relatively wild.

Keywords:   wilderness designation, National Park Service, wilderness legislation, oyster cultivation, Point Reyes, Wilderness Act, Drakes Bay Oyster Company, potential wilderness

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.