Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
SyntheticHow Life Got Made$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sophia Roosth

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226440323

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226440637.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 September 2018

The Synthetic Kingdom: Transgenic Kinship in the Postgenomic Era

The Synthetic Kingdom: Transgenic Kinship in the Postgenomic Era

Chapter:
(p.53) Chapter Two The Synthetic Kingdom: Transgenic Kinship in the Postgenomic Era
Source:
Synthetic
Author(s):

Sophia Roosth

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226440637.003.0005

Chapter 2, “The Synthetic Kingdom,” examines Bay Area synthetic biologists building organisms that manufacture fuels and drugs, such as Jay Keasling, whose goal was to manufacture cheap antimalarial drugs in bacterial hosts. This chapter appraises how these researchers think about the microbes they made: E. coli and yeast, brewing in flasks, containing genes from disparate kingdoms and domains of life. Joining the history of biological taxonomy to anthropological theories of queer or “voluntary” kinship demonstrates that such organisms inaugurate new forms of relatedness, which synthetic biologists treat as both putatively “natural” and phylogenetically ambiguous. Such "postnatural" organisms do not fit neatly into trees of life based on descent, ancestry, or lineage. Some scientists and artists even debate whether they are building a new branch of the tree of life, “Kingdom Synthetica.” Their efforts undermine any notion of biological relatedness as fixed or natural. It may seem counterintuitive to use queer kinship theory to describe bioengineered organisms. This chapter nonetheless contends that, just as queer kinship problematizes Euro-American faiths in blood-based nuclear relatedness, engineered life-forms behave queerly, undermining theories of descent and lineage even in those organisms that have not been transgenically tampered with.

Keywords:   taxonomy, kinship, postnatural, Jay Keasling, queer, transgenic organisms

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.