Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ethics and the OratorThe Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gary A. Remer

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226439167

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226439334.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 November 2017

Rhetoric, Emotional Manipulation, and Morality: The Contemporary Relevance of Cicero vis-à-vis Aristotle

Rhetoric, Emotional Manipulation, and Morality: The Contemporary Relevance of Cicero vis-à-vis Aristotle

Chapter:
(p.34) Chapter 1 Rhetoric, Emotional Manipulation, and Morality: The Contemporary Relevance of Cicero vis-à-vis Aristotle
Source:
Ethics and the Orator
Author(s):

Gary A. Remer

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226439334.003.0003

Although it is widely accepted that Aristotle forges a better relationship among rhetoric, the emotions, and political morality than Cicero, this chapter contends that Cicero, not Aristotle, offers a more relevant account of the relationship among these terms. It is argued in this chapter that, by grounding his account of emotional appeals in the art of rhetoric, Aristotle does not evade the moral problems originating in emotional manipulation. Moreover, Aristotle’s approach to emotional appeals in politics is static, unable to adapt to new political circumstances when compared to Cicero’s approach. It is suggested that Cicero’s approach to the rhetorical emotions is more acceptable to a modern audience than Aristotle’s because it is ethically based while also responsive to political realities. Cicero accommodates emotional appeals to circumstance based on his belief in decorum as a moral principle. Further, it is shown in this chapter that emotional manipulation in Cicero is not as problematical as it initially appears.

Keywords:   Cicero, Aristotle, rhetoric, political morality, emotional manipulation, emotions, decorum

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.