Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Patent PoliticsLife Forms, Markets, and the Public Interest in the United States and Europe$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Shobita Parthasarathy

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226437859

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226437996.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 November 2017

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction
Source:
Patent Politics
Author(s):

Shobita Parthasarathy

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226437996.003.0001

The introduction puts the US and European life form patent controversies into broader context of conflicts over intellectual property rights and science and technology policymaking. It suggests that the rise of social movement engagement with patent systems worldwide is part a broader phenomenon of growing citizen distrust in government and frustration that innovation policy does not reflect public needs and concerns. It argues that in order to understand, and reform, patent systems in the public interest, policymakers, innovators, and the public must look beyond the law. They must consider the social and political construction of patents, and patent systems. To make this argument, it introduces the idea that political culture and ideology have led the United States and Europe to define patents, and patent systems, in fundamentally different ways. This has implications for how the two places understand expertise in the patent system, appropriate participants and participation, and the role of the patent system overall. The introduction also briefly reviews the qualitative methods of data collection and analysis for the book, which include interviews, participant observation, document and historical analysis (this is discussed in more detail in the Methodological Appendix).

Keywords:   life form, intellectual property, social movement, patent system, patent reform, historical methods, citizen distrust, science and technology policy, law, qualitative methods

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.