Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Science, Conservation, and National Parks$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven R. Beissinger, David D. Ackerly, Holly Doremus, and Gary E. Machlis

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226422954

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226423142.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 14 December 2018

The Near-Horizon Future of Science and the National Parks

The Near-Horizon Future of Science and the National Parks

Chapter:
(p.347) Seventeen The Near-Horizon Future of Science and the National Parks
Source:
Science, Conservation, and National Parks
Author(s):

Gary E. Machlis

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226423142.003.0017

The near-horizon future of science in the national parks is likely to include significant new advances in theory, methods, and applications. These new challenges and opportunities are accompanied by complex scientific controversies. This chapter presents examples of emerging scientific fields and disciplines (from quantum biology to cliodynamics) and for each describes possible implications for park science. It briefly describes emerging methods, tools, and datasets (such as eDNA, biocuration, and big data analytics), discussing how each of these innovations may contribute to park science. The chapter identifies several scientific and science policy issues that are controversial, including de-extinction, human-assisted evolution, the role of citizen science, and the tension between data collection and surveillance. It concludes with an example of science policy recommendations from the 2012 Revisiting Leopold Report that may help shape the near horizon future of science in the national parks.

Keywords:   future, park science, science applications, science policy, citizen science, de-extinction

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.