Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Second-Best JusticeThe Virtues of Japanese Private Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

J. Mark Ramseyer

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780226281995

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226282046.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 August 2018

Wrong but Predictably Wrong

Wrong but Predictably Wrong

Labor, Landlord-Tenant, and Consumer Finance

Chapter:
(p.164) Chapter Six Wrong but Predictably Wrong
Source:
Second-Best Justice
Author(s):

J. Mark Ramseyer

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226282046.003.0006

Japanese judges offer a routinized service. Rather than aim for the unattainable first-best particular, they supply the manageable second-best routine. Yet Japanese judges do not always choose wisely. Yet even when they choose foolishly, they choose in a predictable fashion: they choose foolishly in ways that the parties to a dispute can usually anticipate. When Japanese judges make these errant choices, they often err in a particular way. The initial judges apparently try to help what they think is the “weaker” party, and do so with a focus on the problem ex post; the succeeding judges follow them because “follow” is what Japanese judges do. The chapter gives three examples. First, in labor law, judges stop firms from dismissing workers during recessions; in the process, they raise the odds that firms will avoid hiring new employees. Second, in landlord-tenant disputes, judges stop landlords from evicting tenants; in the process, they raise the odds that owners will avoid renting empty units. Third, in consumer finance, judges ban firms from lending to high-risk borrowers at market rates; in the process, they increase the odds that lenders will shun poorer applicants.

Keywords:   labor, strike, real estate, eviction, personal finance, usury

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.