This chapter opens with a reconstruction of the opening articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that makes it, as a response to the Nazi deformation of law, an exact analogue of the uprising of the rule of law analyzed in Chapter 1. It is then argued that modern moral philosophy in its deontological, rule-based and utilitarian forms are forces of moral alienation, that is, they are forms of moral reflection and self-understanding that separate persons from their deepest moral commitments and experiences. Utilitarianism undermines our collective experience and understanding about the meaning of torture in relation to the rule of law; while deontological moral principles undermine women’s experiential knowledge of the moral injury of rape, while tacitly leaving the deformation of patriarchal assumptions about embodiment and reason untouched. Modern moral philosophy abstracts from moral experience, making the reality of moral injury imponderable. As a consequence, most women in the modern world do not and cannot have the trust in the world enjoyed by most men. Such an unequal distribution of trust is a marker for our moral malformation and the systematic injustice of the modern society.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.