Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Science and Engineering Careers in the United StatesAn Analysis of Markets and Employment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Richard B. Freeman and Daniel L. Goroff

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780226261898

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226261904.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 December 2017

The Growing Allocative Inefficiency of the U.S. Higher Education Sector

The Growing Allocative Inefficiency of the U.S. Higher Education Sector

Chapter:
(p.349) 11 The Growing Allocative Inefficiency of the U.S. Higher Education Sector
Source:
Science and Engineering Careers in the United States
Author(s):

James D. Adams

J. Roger Clemmons

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226261904.003.0012

This chapter presents new evidence on the productivity of U.S. universities. Interest in this subject originates with recent developments in U.S. higher education that strike as noteworthy and perhaps troubling. First, despite their high state, growth of employment and output in top U.S. research universities has slowed down in recent years. And second, growth of university research has not kept pace with that of industrial research. This chapter finds evidence of growing allocative inefficiency in U.S. higher education. The most compelling evidence for this claim derives from research output, which is better measured than teaching output at the same time. It is found that the universities whose productivity grows less rapidly experience more rapid growth in research share. The chapter suggests a different and more privatized approach to funding universities that would place greater reliance on parental finance of teaching, and federal and private foundation finance of research. In any event, some solution seems urgent if the United States is to retain its preeminence in higher education, and subsequently in academic and industrial science, technology, and innovation.

Keywords:   sciences, engineering, United States, universities, higher education, industrial science, technology

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.