Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Golden RulesThe Origins of California Water Law in the Gold Rush$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark Kanazawa

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780226258676

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226258706.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 14 December 2017

The Origins of Prior Appropriation

The Origins of Prior Appropriation

Chapter:
(p.183) Chapter Seven The Origins of Prior Appropriation
Source:
Golden Rules
Author(s):

Mark Kanazawa

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226258706.003.0007

Chapter 7 examines the creation in the courts of the fundamental basis for California water law: the principle of prior appropriation. The principle of prior appropriation did not emerge immediately; rather, it only occurred when mining moved away from surface water and water came to be diverted from remote sources. At the same time, however, we also observe the side-by-side emergence of water rights based upon riparian law, in good part because of a legislative mandate to apply English common law principles to water disputes. Part of the challenge faced by the courts was to create a consistent doctrine that respected both appropriative and riparian principles while promoting the widespread use of water in mining. They met this challenge by invoking the public lands status of the gold fields, whereas riparian rights were based on private land ownership. This freed them to adopt other English common law principles to justify the first possession principles on which prior appropriation is based. In a series of rulings, the Court filled out additional elements of the appropriative right, including defining due diligence in prosecuting construction of a ditch, beneficial use, and the use requirement.

Keywords:   appropriative right, riparian right, quantification, beneficial use, use requirement, abandonment

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.