Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Grasping Hand"Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ilya Somin

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780226256603

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226256740.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Why the Backlash Often Fell Short

Why the Backlash Often Fell Short

Chapter:
(p.165) Chapter Six Why the Backlash Often Fell Short
Source:
The Grasping Hand
Author(s):

Ilya Somin

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226256740.003.0006

This chapter describes the massive political backlash generated by the Kelo decision, which was in many ways greater than that which resulted from any other modern Supreme Court decision. Polls showed that over 80% of the public opposed the ruling, a sentiment that cut across racial, partisan, and ideological lines. A record 45 states adopted eminent domain reform laws in the wake of the decision, as did the federal government. But while some of these laws were strong and effective, a majority provided little if any meaningful new protection for property owners. Many banned takings for “economic development,” but continued to permit very similar “blight” condemnations, under definitions of blight so broad that virtually any area could be declared blighted and subject to condemnation. However, state reforms enacted by referendum tended to be much stronger than those enacted through the regular legislative process.

Keywords:   political ignorance, knowledge, voting, public opinion, referenda, rational ignorance, state legislatures, state politics

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.