Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Future of Healthcare Reform In the United States$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Anup Malani and Michael H. Schill

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780226254951

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226255002.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 December 2017

Federalism, Liberty, and Risk in NFIB v. Sebelius

Federalism, Liberty, and Risk in NFIB v. Sebelius

Chapter:
(p.32) Chapter Two Federalism, Liberty, and Risk in NFIB v. Sebelius
Source:
The Future of Healthcare Reform In the United States
Author(s):

Aziz Z. Huq

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226255002.003.0002

This chapter offers an account of how NFIB v. Sebelius fits into the constitutional tradition. The opinion rests on three central questions: (1) Is imposition of the individual mandate within Congress's Article I power to regulate commerce, or, (2) alternatively within its power to tax for the General Welfare? And (3) does the Medicaid expansion violate the constitutional principle of federalism in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution? The chapter argues that the Court's reasoning takes root in profound first-order normative principles about the appropriate role of the federal government. The NFIB decision superficially turns on the relationship of the federal government to the states, but federalism explains very little of its outcome. Rather, a dyad of opposing values—liberty and risk—animates the Court's ruling, which is better glossed as a function of the justices' normative judgments about the permissible balance between risk and liberty that the federal government can strike. A constitutionalized view of normatively permissible risk-liberty trade-off best explains NFIB.

Keywords:   health care reform, Affordable Care Act, minimum essential coverage, individual mandate, ObamaCare, federalism, conditional spending, risk regulation, Necessary and proper

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.