Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Objectivity and DiversityAnother Logic of Scientific Research$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sandra Harding

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780226241227

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 24 September 2018

Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below

Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below

Chapter:
(p.26) 2 Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below
Source:
Objectivity and Diversity
Author(s):

Sandra Harding

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.003.0002

It is an epistemological mistake to conflate the motivation of research by social values or interests with an inevitable deterioriation of its reliability and predictive powers. After all, corporate, imperial, or military interests and motives don’t make weapons less reliable at killing; nor do environmental or health concerns in themselves damage the reliability of research they motivate. Only in some cases, but not all, do social values and interests have that effect. The social justice movements have produced a standpoint methodology more competent to maximize objectivity. The need for standpoint’s “strong objectivity” arises when research communities lack diversity and are isolated from pro-democratic social tendencies. Research that starts off questioning nature and social relations from the daily lives of economically and politically vulnerable groups can increase its reliability and predictive power. Such research insists on the conventional goals of fairness to the data and to its severest criticisms. It retains central commitments of the conventional notion of objectivity while escaping its limitations.

Keywords:   diversity, epistemology, methodology, objectivity, strong, research, social justice, standpoint

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.