Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Neither Donkey nor HorseMedicine in the Struggle over China's Modernity$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sean Hsiang-lin Lei

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226169880

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226169910.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 November 2017

Imagining the Relationship between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, 1890–1928

Imagining the Relationship between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, 1890–1928

Chapter:
(p.69) 4 Imagining the Relationship between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, 1890–1928
Source:
Neither Donkey nor Horse
Author(s):

Sean Hsiang-lin Lei

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226169910.003.0004

Chapter 4 discusses how Chinese people imagined the relationship between Chinese medicine and Western medicine, and traces how this conception evolved, from the popular idea of “converging Chinese and Western medicine” championed by Tang Zonghai in the 1890s to the emergence of a radically different modernist discourse advocated by Yu Yan in the late 1910s. Based on a globally circulated discourse of modernity, Yu Yan partitioned Chinese medicine into three distinctive categories: theory, Chinese drugs, and experience. On the one hand, this tripartite characterization encouraged the abandonment of what many then considered the erroneous theories of Chinese medicine; on the other hand, with the help of the internationally renowned research on ephedrine at PUMC, it helped to generate a national consensus on the study of Chinese drugs. Until the eve of the 1929 confrontation, practitioners of Chinese medicine had managed to resist this modernist discourse, which effectively denied the possibility of the co-existence between two medical traditions.

Keywords:   Yu Yan, Tang Zonghai, K. K. Chen, Zhnag Taiyan, Yu Jianquan, qi-transformation, meridian channels, ephedrine, Chinese drugs, ontology

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.