Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Good ProjectHumanitarian Relief NGOs and the Fragmentation of Reason$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Monika Krause

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226131221

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226131535.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 July 2018

Beneficiaries as a Commodity

Beneficiaries as a Commodity

Chapter:
(p.39) Two Beneficiaries as a Commodity
Source:
The Good Project
Author(s):

Monika Krause

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226131535.003.0003

This chapter explores what the pursuit of the good project in humanitarian relief means for how managers imagine people in need. The role of the populations being served has often been ignored by economists researching non-profit firms, third-party buying or charitable giving. It has been misunderstood by theorists of civil society who either posit populations in need as entirely separate from NGOs or as entirely the same as NGOs. When agencies produce projects for a quasi-market in which institutional donors are the consumers, populations in need are part of the product being packaged and sold by relief organizations. This means beneficiaries are put in a position where they are in competition with each other to become part of a project. As a mode of governance, in addition to the benefits for those in need emphasized by liberal observers and the forms of direct domination highlighted by critics, we also find a form of indirect domination in humanitarian relief, which is mediated by the market for projects.

Keywords:   beneficiaries, non-profit firms, clients, organizations, humanitarian relief, civil society, third-party buying, charitable giving, indirect domination, institutional donors

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.