Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Power to Do JusticeJurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of Common Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bradin Cormack

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780226116242

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226116259.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 October 2018

“Shewe Us Your Mynde Then”: Bureaucracy and Royal Privilege in Skelton's Magnyfycence

“Shewe Us Your Mynde Then”: Bureaucracy and Royal Privilege in Skelton's Magnyfycence

Chapter:
(p.47) CHAPTER ONE “Shewe Us Your Mynde Then”: Bureaucracy and Royal Privilege in Skelton's Magnyfycence
Source:
A Power to Do Justice
Author(s):

Bradin Cormack

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226116259.003.0003

This chapter argues that John Skelton's Magnyfycence was a response to the bureaucratization of royal authority under the early Tudors. Traditionally read as a warning about excessive expenditure in the royal household, the play emerges instead as an act of political theory, a meditation on the nature of royal identity inside a rapidly evolving administrative culture. This culture abstracted authority from any fully coherent origin and relocated it in a more quantitatively oriented process of management and measurement. In the play, dramatic representation and political representation meet as forms of distribution and embodiment for the consolidation of authority. Skelton describes and analyzes the forms of political delegation by charting the royal household's aggressively bureaucratic pursuit of royal privilege on feudal lands. He also examines legal writing, the material embodiment of delegation, as a site of vulnerability in the state's reproduction and extension of its power. Moreover, Skelton externalizes the idea of royal intention by bringing it in proximity to the idea of equity as a non-arcane principle of legal interpretation and the de facto motor for judicial centralization.

Keywords:   John Skelton, Magnyfycence, bureaucratization, royal authority, Tudors, political theory, royal privilege, royal household, legal writing, centralization

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.