Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Howard S. Becker and Michal M. McCall

Print publication date: 1990

Print ISBN-13: 9780226041179

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226041056.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 January 2018

Art Worlds: Developing the Interactionist Approach to Social Organization

Art Worlds: Developing the Interactionist Approach to Social Organization

Chapter:
(p.148) 6 Art Worlds: Developing the Interactionist Approach to Social Organization
Source:
Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies
Author(s):

Samuel Gilmore

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226041056.003.0007

Writing about symbolic interaction and the arts, one becomes immersed in issues of social organization. The development of an interactionist approach to social structure has greatly benefited from research in the arts, particularly the effort to construct a macro-level interactionist conception of society. An emphasis on an integrated micro-macro analysis is the distinguishing feature of the interactionist approach to social organization. Social worlds are useful as an interactionist unit of social organization because of the dual emphasis on structural and cultural elements. This dual emphasis is illustrated by artistic participants' group construct of an “art world.” This chapter reviews studies in the arts, clustered into production, distribution, and consumption stages, that are of interest to interactionists if not actually done by interactionist researchers. It treats these stages as a technical separation of activities, often not so clearly differentiated socially. It prefers to define the “production” of culture in a generic sense, applicable to all three technical stages including “processes of creation, manufacture, marketing, distribution, exhibiting, inculcation, evaluation, and consumption.”

Keywords:   symbolic interaction, arts, social organization, art world, production, distribution, consumption, culture

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.