Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Enduring Importance of Leo Strauss$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laurence Lampert

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780226039480

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226039510.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 October 2018

Attacking the Enlightenment on Behalf of Orthodoxy

Attacking the Enlightenment on Behalf of Orthodoxy

The Introduction to Philosophy and Law

Chapter:
(p.189) Chapter Seven Attacking the Enlightenment on Behalf of Orthodoxy
Source:
The Enduring Importance of Leo Strauss
Author(s):

Laurence Lampert

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226039510.003.0008

This chapter deals with Strauss’s 1935 Introduction to Philosophy and Law and its critique of the modern Enlightenment, a critique that focuses on its alleged founders, Descartes and Hobbes, and its alleged outcome in Nietzsche and Heidegger. Strauss argues on behalf of Orthodoxy or the Biblical view that the modern Enlightenment eclipsed. Did the Enlightenment deserve to win its war against Orthodoxy? Strauss argues No, claiming that its winning arguments are not defensible and that Orthodoxy can therefore now be legitimately reestablished against the now waning Enlightenment. This chapter argues that Strauss’s own arguments are consciously sophistic and aim only at establishing a new prejudice; his arguments are therefore not definitive. They lack effectiveness especially against Nietzsche, from whom Strauss borrowed his ultimate argument against the outcome of the Enlightenment, namely, that it is based in mere virtue, in honesty or Redlichkeit, and not in philosophy or love of truth.

Keywords:   Bacon, Descartes, Founders of Modern Science, Heidegger, Hobbes, honesty, Modern Enlightenment, Nietzsche, Redlichkeit, virtue

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.