This chapter explores the adventures of truth as a discursive claim. It argues that adherence to any religion is not the only result of such a conception of the sign. More in general, this qualified, transformative wholeness of the sign provides the space for a freedom à la Baruch Spinoza. Such a freedom is “critical,” as philosopher James Tully says. Critical freedom is the practice of seeing the specificity of one's own world as one among others, and intertemporally, this freedom sees the present as fully engaged with the past that, insofar as it is part of the present, one can freely rewrite. This chapter focuses on the relationship to truth as it manifests itself in the discursive versionings of Yusuf's and Mut's story, and calls this relationship truth speak.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.