Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Optional LawThe Structure of Legal Entitlements$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ian Ayres

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780226033464

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see http://www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 January 2018

Multiple Takings

Multiple Takings

Chapter:
(p.125) Chapter Seven Multiple Takings
Source:
Optional Law
Author(s):

Ian Ayres

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.003.0007

Liability rules applied to tangible legal entitlements might give rise to problems of reciprocal takings in which a plaintiff and defendant engage in a protracted (and potentially endless) series of destructive takings of the same entitlement from one another. Moreover, liability rules might induce multiple takers to threaten taking, thus undermining the incentives of an initial entitlement holder to bargain to retain her entitlement with any individual potential taker. This chapter argues that the potential for multiple takings poses a real problem, but that enlightened courts can structure liability rules to economize on the litigants' private information. It considers the “numerous-takers” problem in which the use of an entitlement by one person (or multiple people) affects the welfare of numerous others. The plume of pollution provides a classic example where one factory's smoke can damage numerous residents. Numerosity makes it harder for courts to use a liability rule to harness the private information of the residents. However, numerosity also cuts against the likely efficiency of property rules, as it will be harder to bargain for efficient allocations.

Keywords:   liability rules, multiple takings, legal entitlements, numerosity, pollution, private information, property rules, allocations, reciprocal takings

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.