Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Optional LawThe Structure of Legal Entitlements$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ian Ayres

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780226033464

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use (for details see www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 October 2018

Single-Chooser Rules

Single-Chooser Rules

Chapter:
(p.39) Chapter Three Single-Chooser Rules
Source:
Optional Law
Author(s):

Ian Ayres

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226033488.003.0003

To date, there has been little analysis of a very basic question: to whom should courts give the initial entitlement? Most authors suggest that courts should grant the initial entitlement to the litigant it believes to have the higher valuation. To maximize allocative efficiency, courts should focus on delegating the allocative choice to the litigant who is the more efficient chooser. From the perspective of the initial entitlement holder, liability rules seem to have compensation as their central aim, whereas from an efficiency perspective liability rules are a means by which an imperfectly informed court can delegate allocative choice to private litigants who potentially have superior allocative information. The allocative efficiency of single-chooser rules is maximized when damages are set equal to the nonchooser's expected value. This chapter discusses single-chooser rules and how courts should determine (allocatively) optimal damage amount for the defendant-choice rules. It demonstrates that the court can decouple questions of distribution from questions of allocation.

Keywords:   allocative efficiency, courts, allocative choice, liability rules, single-chooser rules, optimal damage, defendant-choice rules, distribution, allocation

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.